Pat O’Donnell and RFC Security

 

Following a mass eviction of approximately 120 tenants from Summerhill Parade in May of this year, various housing activists occupied one of the vacated houses, number 35 Summerhill Parade.

 

The house was held for 10 days. Initially, Pat O’Donnell & Co denied any connection to the houses, however they were forced to reveal themselves when they served a Court Summons on the occupants of the house.

 

This house is owned by Pat O’Donnell & Co Ltd Retirement and Death Benefit Plan, which is connected to Pat O’Donnell & Co – who we met back in May.

 

On 16th of August the O’Donnell family took an injunction against the occupants. This would allow the occupants to be removed by force from the property if necessary.

 

Slumleaks have reason to believe that RFC Security have been hired by the O’Donnells to forcibly remove the occupants from 35 Summerhill Parade.

 

RFC have been monitoring the buildings on Summerhill Parade and it is expected that they will move in on the occupants early tomorrow morning.

 

 

RFC Security’s Managing Director is one Richie Flood. According to a close source, he was arrested in possession of large amount of cocaine while driving an RFC company van several years ago. Richie was held for questioning before being released.

 

 

In addition to Mr Flood’s shady, potentially criminal background it is common knowledge that RFC is a highly exploitative employer. The use of bogus contracts is a common complaint made about RFC’s business practices.

One instance of this is security staff being employed as cleaners, on a significantly lower rate of pay than normal security staff. Besides being an example of odious exploitation, this constitutes a breach of PSA standards, rules and regulations.

 

Some of the sites in Dublin RFC operates on:

 

The Mercantile Pub

 

Stag’s Head

 

Oliver StJohnGogarty’s

 

Trinity Bar

 

Club M

 

Turks Head

 

Whelans

 

The Temple Bar

 

The Village Camden St

 

Flannery’s

 

Fitzsimons

 

Hickey’s Pharmacies Dublin City Centre

 

Fatface Henry St

 

McDonalds Grafton St

 

Liverpool FC shop ILAC centre

 

Regatta ILAC

 

Centra Temple Bar

 

Centra Dame St

 

Spar Dame St

 

The Button Factory

 

Westland Sq. Car Park

Who is James Devine?

Last month we heard about James Devine, a landlord who terrorised a family out of their home in Lucan – despite the fact that they always paid their rent on time. He launched a campaign of harassment and intimidation when they asked him to carry out basic repairs on the house.

 

The Dublin Inquirer have also covered this case, revealing that Devine did something similar to a previous tenant in 2016-17.

 

So who exactly is the delightful James Devine, and why does he bully perfectly decent, well-behaved tenants out of their home in such a blatant manner? Why doesn’t he just do what many landlords are doing these days, and say they need to leave due to renovations? By all accounts, the house needed some work.

 

Slumleaks has done some digging on James Devine, and what we found was that this aggressive, bullying behaviour seems to be the norm for him.

 

Originally from a farming background in Treenlaur near Swinford, Co. Mayo, his main line of work for some years has been in plant hire – most recently he registered J Devine Civils Ltd in April 2018, at his address in Knappagh, near Westport, Co Mayo.

However, he has a string of convictions, mostly traffic-related. These convictions are documented in various newspaper reports over the years, and demonstrate that the man has what can be politely described as a short temper.

 

His first traffic-related offence was in 1992, when he was just 18. He was fined £200 for making false declarations to a car insurance broker, as was his father, Michael J Devine.

 

In 1993, he was charged with vandalising his neighbour’s hay bales while drunk. He was 20 at the time.

 

In July 2003, he was fined for dangerous driving in Dublin. He had been stopped by a Garda after doing an illegal U-turn on a busy road. He told the Garda he wouldn’t go to court, drove his 4×4 towards him, nearly hitting him. Afterwards he told the Garda “you’ve made a very big mistake today”. Devine pleaded guilty to dangerous driving.

 

In July 2005, James Devine was fined €2000 and given a 6-month suspended sentence for road offences & road rage. This time, he overtook another motorist on the M50, and then obstructed a Garda.

 

In May 2008 James Devine was fined €1500 & disqualified from driving for 2 yrs in a Longford court. He was charged with speeding and crossing a white line, causing danger to other drivers. The judge described him as “a maniac on the roads” and noted that he had a number of previous convictions.

 

 

It appears that the unfortunate Lukadi family are just the most recent victims of James Devine’s temper.

 

So he mightn’t be a great driver or neighbour, but what of his other hobbies?

In 2006, he took out shares in a Maltese-registered company, Canada Square (Malta) Ltd. He was one of many – there were 81 shareholders in total, all Irish, most small or medium-sized business people involved in either construction or real estate, with a few retailers and farm-related businesses thrown in for good measure.

It’s unclear why so many Irish business people invested in a Maltese-registered company, but this wasn’t that strange during the Celtic Tiger – just think about how many people bought property in Bulgaria.

Canada Square (Malta) Ltd was liquidated in February 2012 – it’s unclear if all the shareholders got a good return on their investment.

 

However, in 2009, James Devine was brought to court by Caterpillar Financial Services (Ireland) Public Limited Company, regarding unpaid loans that he took out in 2006 to buy the house on Foxborough Road.

The three years between 2006 and 2009 were a long three years in the Irish property market – it’s reasonably safe to assume that, while Devine has managed to keep possession of the house on Foxborough Road, he maybe didn’t get the best return on his Maltese investment.

Somehow, we can’t really feel sorry for him though.

James Devine – Tenant Story

“Life has been a nightmare to be honest. We have been coming from Direct Provision, and we have other friends who are renting from very good landlords. We know that it’s not like all the Irish people are like this, we know that there are good landlords out there. We are renting from someone who has no heart. “

These are the words of Iness Lukadi, who has been resident at a house on Foxborough Road in Lucan with her husband and their four children for the last year. Before this, they were in Direct Provision for 5 years – moving to Lucan can only have felt like a blessed escape after so long in restricted accomodation without freedom to work or cook for themselves, and the meager personal allowance of €21.60 each per week which is provided to asylum seekers upon arrival.

 

The family obtained residency in 2015, but nevertheless spent another two difficult years searching for a home to move into. They had exhausted their period of clemency, and had little option but to accept this house, having spent 2 years saving for a deposit of €2000. They accepted it, despite the lack of a local school place for their children and Iness’ own studies in IT Tallaght making it highly inconvenient.

Even then, they remained dependent on HAP to be able to rent at all. The house was in poor condition, but money was made available for repairs. Little did Iness know that this was just the beginning.

The landlord asked HAP to pay 2 months repair deposit and 1 months rent in advance. So he got €7800 from HAP and €2000 from us. So just for us moving in he got €9800….When we called to meet him, we found people doing jobs…He told us that the way it is with HAP we give our own deposit, and once he processes the payment he gives it back. So when we came here he said we should give him €2000 euro deposit, and when HAP pays him he’s going to refund that money. When HAP paid him the €7800, he didn’t give back that €2000. That means he got €9800 for nothing.

Had they left the next day, the landlord could have kept every penny.

Unfortunately, the house was badly in need of more maintenance than even €7800 could have paid for.

 

 

When we had a bath, the water was leaking. We spotted that on the very first day, but he told us that those guys who were fixing the house were gonna take care of it. But when we moved in, nothing was done.… we have to keep the window open because of the damp. The whole ceiling is covered in damp – if you close it you can feel the humidity. We have kids so we have to keep the window open.”

 

 

“We didn’t have any cooking facilities. The cooker hasn’t been working. It’s a gas cooker, he asked my husband to fix it – my husband told him he didn’t have any experience to fix gas cookers, then he says that we should look for someone to fix it, that it’s not his problem and that we should just fix it. We don’t have a cooking facility – we don’t have a microwave, we don’t have a washing machine, we don’t have a fridge and we don’t have a dishwasher… so we don’t have any basics in the kitchen.”

 

 

“There is no light (in the children’s bedroom). That meant the girls were sleeping in a room with no light for the first 8 months – you can see the wire that connects the light was completely cut off. we had to use a torch or a phone to put them to bed. It’s just 2/3 months ago that he sent someone around to connect a light.”

 

The landlord regarded even the most innocuous requests with disdain, and reneged on his promises to spend the HAP grant on helping Iness and her husband provide a home for their children immediately.

 

“There was a time I asked him for a microwave, and he was so insulting to me. There’s a message on the phone where he says “What else do you want, a back massager? You are asking me for a microwave? – what next a back massager?” Just for me to ask for a microwave…and what is a microwave compared to the money he’s getting every month?”

 

Worse was to come, as he soon began seeking a further €400 per month in rent. This was despite the total lack of any effort on his part to improve the house.

 

“We pay €2350 every month, Hap is already paying him €1950 every month – he wants another €400 on top but we don’t have any basics in the kitchen. I can’t prepare a meal for my children.

Our heating? The boiler doesn’t work. If you put in credit on the machine, it will be running but the boiler will take maybe 3-4 days before it starts working so it’s costing me as well. I might spend €30 topping up, but it’s only maybe 5 euro that I use. We don’t have a fireplace – so you imagine with that snow. I had to buy blankets to wrap my kids up in. There’s no heating and there’s no fireplace.

My kids have really suffered and there is nothing that we can do about it. They said we should deal with it, we should take the house the way it is, it’s a nightmare.”

 

Unfortunately, much worse than indifference and greed was to come.

Devine wanted to embellish his relationship with the family on paper, purely for his own benefit.

“He asked us to tell HAP we had taken up this house from the 1st of April. We didn’t take the house on the 1st of April, so we told HAP we had taken the house on the 13th of April because that was when we gave him the deposit and took the keys to the house. On the form, there’s the landlord’s section that he has to fill in, he filled in the 1st April. When I went to HAP I said I took it on the 13th. So they started paying him on the 13th.

 

Again, Devine told the family to lie on the HAP forms;

He said “That’s not what we agreed.” He told us to tell HAP to say we took it on the 1st. We couldn’t do that, we couldn’t lie. That upset him. So because HAP is paying him according to the date that we moved in, it took some time for them to backdate all his payments. So he kept on sending us back to HAP. HAP kept telling us that “we don’t deal with tenants when it came to landlord’s money, so tell your landlord to ring us.” But every time we did that , he said “It’s your responsibility, you have to go to HAP and make sure my rent is being paid”.

It was so much it was difficult. It was our first time renting as well, so we didn’t know. For him, he knew the game he was playing.”

 

At no point did the family meekly accept their fate. Their financial and emotional investment in this property was too much for that to be possible. They arranged for an inspector who could prove the extent to which they were being neglected.

“The problems escalated when the inspectors came to inspect the property. They called him and sent him an improvement notice. He was so upset that we had let the inspectors come and inspect his property – he didn’t want anyone calling him about his property. So that was the beginning of problems. That’s when we started getting text messages, we started getting calls.”

 

Iness tried to stand up for herself and her children by seeking legal protection from the RTB after several weeks of abuse and neglect. This only enraged her landlord further. His greed turned into spite.

“We took him to RTB (over the abusive messages). The RTB made a decision saying he should pay for the damages, which he appealed.

He refused to pay for the damages, for the messages he has been sending. He hasn’t given us a peaceful occupation. He was asked to pay us 2800 euro but that’s not our point.

We didn’t take him to RTB because we wanted the money. We wanted a peaceful life. He can’t come anytime – he came at midnight. He sent people, maybe even 5 people in a day to look at the house – they said they were going to do some work. But he wouldn’t ring me to say he was sending these people.

I have kids in the house, I can’t let people in and out. But if I refuse, I’ll be insulted the whole day. He’s made my life very difficult.”

 

While the RTB case was still pending, intimidation gradually escalated to violence, as the family refused to give in to his efforts to destroy what they’d worked so hard to build.

 

“He began by stabbing my car tyres. All the tyres were stabbed. He sent his boys to do it. He’d say “Are you moving out?” and we’d say “ No we’re not moving out, we’re waiting for RTB and RTB is still pending. We’re still waiting for RTB decision to come out.” He’d tell us he was going to send some boys out, and it wasn’t a joke. Within 2-3 weeks there’d be some boys who would smash the windows. Once we’d fixed those windows, he’s coming to throw the eggs on those windows. Once you forget after a week or so, because we had to fix the car. I need the car, I need to drive my kids to school. Once you fix the car, he’s coming to break them again. And in this area, there’s no place you can safely park because every house has its own parking. I was forced to go and park somewhere outside my house where they couldn’t find my car.”

 

 

Ironically, in many respects the family have been model tenants. They have spent much of their own money on improvements, and HAP has ensured they are never in arrears despite their difficult circumstances. This matters little to the landlord, and his behaviour and attitude towards the RTB means that it’s hard to believe he’ll follow their ruling.

“He has no reason to terminate us because our rent is up to date. There was a time we went to tribunal and he got up and walked away in the middle of the tribunal hearing. He told the judge “tell these people to get out of my house. I don’t have time for this nonsense.”

 

His campaign of bullying and intimidation came to a head over the recent May Bank Holiday weekend.

The weekend began with Iness’ car being smashed up by four young men with baseball bats on Friday evening.

“There were four guys in the car. They parked at the corner, came out with the baseball bats… my husband wasn’t around. It was just me and my four kids in the house. We hear “bouf bouf bouf” outside and I was busy calling neighbours, because once they see neighbours they run.”

 

 

“I ran outside with my phone ringing the guards. They skidded around the back of the house and climbed another wall behind my house. They jumped inside my back garden and smashed all the windows in the back garden and went. They knew at that time we were busy calling the guards, so we couldn’t track them down.”

“He called us on Saturday on a private number. I answered the phone – I heard him and dropped the phone.  I rang my husband to find out if he was calling him, and my husband said “No, why is he calling you?” My husband was in the UK at that time escorting my son’s football team, so he called him to ask “why are you calling my wife, what is it that you want?”. He said “Why are you not moving out?

I was left in the house with my three girls. It was really scary – me and my three kids were traumatised. It’s like every time it happens, you go back to your children and tell them it’s OK, that they won’t be back again. After a week, it happens again and you have to tell your kids it won’t happen again.

….For me as a parent, it’s so hard lying to my kids. Every time they just come back and do the same thing.”

 

The personal and professional toll this treatment has taken on Iness’ life and her family has made it almost impossible for them to start a new life here. Iness’ efforts to improve her job prospects through education have been severely compromised.

“That’s cost my studies as well. For me, I have exams Thursday, Friday, Saturday. I’ve spent 3 days in emergency accomodation with no internet. All my notes are online- that means I can’t study or prepare myself for that exam. I’m busy working out where I’m going to sleep tomorrow instead of concentrating on my studies. I have only 1 day to go into my pre-exams.

This school I’m paying for myself, I’m not on a SUSI grant.

But this happened at the same time last year – I went to do one exam and I failed because it was the time he was sending me all the messages. The subject was Business Maths – I couldn’t do it. I went to the exam blank because I couldn’t concentrate – I couldn’t do it.

If you fail you have to pay 185 euro extra for every subject so it’s still costing me. I have to fix my cars, I have to find a way of cooking for myself, I have to find a way of washing for my kids, I have to find a way of paying for my exams that I failed.”

 

However, the effect it has had on her children has almost been harder to bear.

 

Today they were not in school. They went into emergency accomodation with just a few clothes. We had to come back, we had to prepare their uniforms… with no iron. I couldn’t come back to prepare their uniforms, so they didn’t go to school. It’s still affecting them.

It’s not easy for them to move, they have friends here. My son has a football club here in Lucan. If I have to take them into emergency accomodation in Tallaght, everything stops. They have to make new friends again, a new life from scratch.

 

The family remain in emergency accomodation in Tallaght for now. All of this stress and heartbreak has been caused for the sake of a mere 400 a month extra in rent.

 

For Iness, however, it is at heart a problem far more serious than anything money alone can solve.

“I just want a place to call home, that’s all I want. This emergency accommodation is not a life, it’s like I’m back in Direct Provision. Nothing has changed – I’m back to square one. I don’t know when that house will happen. It’s like waiting for your residence- you don’t know when it will happen. I’m just hoping for my kids that it will happen. I just want my kids to enjoy their freedom.”

 

Pat O’Donnell & Co. at Aldborough House

Previously on Slumleaks, we introduced the O’Donnell clan and their companies.

Their introductions left us with more questions than answers, and our researchers at Slumleaks HQ were keen to know more. So, shovels at the ready, the digging commenced… and led us to a golden nugget known as Aldborough House.

What is Aldborough House and how is a derelict Georgian mansion on Portland Row connected to the O’Donnell family?

 

Sit back and relax folks, this one is about to get interesting.

To give a brief introduction, Aldborough House was the last Georgian mansion to be built in Dublin. It was used as a school in 18th Century before coming into State ownership in 1843.  Since then the house served various public roles until it was privately bought in the late 1990s.

 

The last two decades have not been kind to Aldborough House, as poor maintenance and upkeep caused the building to decay. There have been various calls by the local community, An Taisce, the Department of Arts and Heritage and the Irish Georgian Society throughout the years for its restoration. However these were largely ignored.

 

As Aldborough House stood derelict it symbolised a lack of State ambition towards community development, a reluctance to  intervene and an acceptance of degeneration.

In 2014, following an arson attack, Reliance Investments Limited purchased the site – as the old sayin’ goes: redevelopers are fond of a good fire.

 

Who owns Reliance Investments Ltd? None other than our star family, the O’Donnells.

 

We previously mentioned that the owners of 38 and 39 Summerhill Parade like to keep their identity unknown to tenants. In addition to being camera shy, the O’Donnells like to apply the same covertness when it comes to affairs of business. Reliance Investments Ltd is no exception, which is why they set about registering it in the Isle of Man, via the names of friends in high places – you’ll see what we mean by this in a moment.

On 11th of July 2014, Reliance Investments Ltd registered as a company in the Isle of Man with the address: Sovereign House, 14-16 Nelson Street, Douglas.

Diane Dentith and John Philip Dentith of Sovereign Registers Limited were initially appointed as directors.

 

A little context to these names: the Sovereign Group is defined as ‘one of the world’s largest consultancies specialising in the provision of offshore trusts and companies and associated international tax advice…. with assets under administration in excess of $10 Billion’ – to which Diane Dentith is named as managing director.

Not only do Diane and John arrange business from the Isle of Man but they too have appointments in the following

That’s right, Panama. Looks like our little auld Irish O’Donnell family are brushing shoulders with some big players.  We’ll give you a moment to let this information sink in….

Indeed, moving to a new island can be stressful and pre-established networks can help ease such a transition. Luckily, Pat O’Donnell & Co.’s biggest shareholder ‘Cronan Limited’ is on hand to help them settle on the Isle. The shares in Pat O’Donnell & Co. total upwards of £55 million, these guys aren’t messing.

We at Slumleaks were of course very interested to know who this best friend/shareholder of Pat O’Donnell & Co. is, so we researched…. and researched…. and researched some more… to find it’s none other than Pat O’Donnell himself; a kind of financial incest so to speak. ‘Money? Oh yeah, we like to keep that in the family’.

 

So back to Reliance Investments Ltd. On the 15th of July 2014 – four days after setting up on the Isle of Man – Reliance Investments Limited registered in Ireland.  Here we have an unconfirmed picture of PJ O’Donnell awaiting the Stenaline home to Dublin:

 

A few months later, Reliance Investments went on to purchase Aldborough House on the 4th of September 2014, but the shy Patrick O’Donnell Snr did not sign himself as director until the 1st of January 2016.

 

A full redevelopment of Aldborough House into office spaces has been given the go-ahead by Dublin City Council despite huge community resistance. You can bet your pennies on this one that Pat O’Donnell and Co. will be onsite providing the construction equipment.

Not only has Aldborough House been left to rot under the O’Donnell’s ownership, they are also succeeding in running down a whole community into slum-like conditions – redevelopers are fond of a good fire, or even, a good slum that can easily catch fire… This is a calculated move, serving only to deteriorate standards for the purpose of redevelopment.

Now that we know this, we can understand why the O’Donnell’s are not so keen to be identified.

Is this IFSC ‘social cleansing’ part two?  You decide.

 

Summerhill Parade – who is the mystery landlord?

Normally, Slumleaks would profile the slumlord to get their name out there. Unfortunately, we have a very mysterious landlord this time around – they haven’t even told the tenants his or her name.

But, this doesn’t discourage us – the gang love a good mystery.

In this spirit, we’ve got three prime suspects and here’s what we’re going on so far:

 

Who is Suspect A?

Suspect A is none other than PJ O’Donnell.  PJ O’Donnell is the son of Pat O’Donnell, famous for founding Pat O’Donnell & Company in 1970 to bring affordable farm and construction machinery to the masses on both sides of the border.

PJ followed his father into the family business, but he has ambitions beyond being a tractor tycoon.  Since 2007, the company has been steadily diversifying into electric vehicles, the management of holding companies…. and property.

PJ is the director of no fewer than two companies in the property industry – Rossdarrig Partnership (est. 1st May 2007) and POD Marine Limited (est. 4th December 2017).

PJ and his father have an admirably close professional relationship, and are both listed as directors for at least six companies including the original business.

PJ has been spotted by our papparazzi entering and leaving 38 + 39 Summerhill Parade.

 

Who is Suspect B?

Suspect B is an estate agent with a million-dollar smile called Myles O’Donoghue.  Myles is an estate agent who is the founder and director of the imaginatively named Myles O’Donoghue Properties Ltd.

Myles enters our story twice: the first was in an email to the tenants, sent by the mysterious Golden Rose Accomodation Limited.  The email claimed that Myles’ estate agency would return the deposit, in co-operation with the mystery landlord.

 

Granted, ADM has misspelt his name (Myles O’Donnell instead of O’Donoghue).  Myles could say we’re jumping to conclusions here and he’d have a point.

This defence wouldn’t quite hold for the second example, in which he was spotted entering the property on Summerhill Parade.  Nobody has such a perfect doppelganger in both name and appearance.

 

Who is Suspect C?

We now come to the most glamourous of our suspects, whose appeal is only helped by the air of mystery which she cultivates.

She is known simply as “Jo”, and has been handling the payouts with the tenants. We don’t know anything else about her other than this photo and that she’s been the principal point of contact which the tenants have with their landlord.

Could she be hiding in plain sight?

 

So, how do all these players come together at 38 + 39 Summerhill Parade?

Jo has been on the property in recent days in her capacity as the tenants’ point of contact. Beforehand, Myles and PJ were spotted entering the property together – check the bald head next to Myles in this photo.  PJ’s even wearing an identical coat.

They’re also neighbours – this maps the distance between Myles and PJ’s Dad’s house.

This second map shows the distance between Myles and PJ’s house.

It’s important to get to know your neighbours but, it’s hard to accept that three people with a strong commercial interest in property who all live within 10 minutes walk of one another have never had a conversation about it.

 

When you consider that Myles and PJ have been spotted together entering the property, the plot thickens – especially when you factor in the enigmatic Jo.

 

Slumleaks will be puzzling over this one for a little while yet.

 

Stay tuned for more.

Some content on this page was disabled on August 17, 2021.
Some content on this page was disabled on August 18, 2021.

Summerhill Parade evictions

On Thursday 3rd of May, a group of tenants living in two houses on Summerhill Parade were told they had two hours to leave their home.

There were 40 tenants, split between each house, many sleeping 4 or 5 to a room in bunkbeds. All were young migrants, mostly from Brazil.

 

A man claiming to represent the owner of the house told the tenants that there was a fire safety issue, and they all needed to leave. He offered them €250 to leave the property immediately – however, this would not be enough to cover the cost of their deposits.

This case was widely covered by media outlets – you can read more from the Indo or the IT or from this statement.

 

Shocking as it may seem, this kind of situation is sadly not unusual in inner city Dublin these days. Take a casual stroll around Summerhill, Mountjoy Sq, Dorset St, parts of Phibsboro and East Wall and you will probably notice houses that seem to be heaving with people – bunk-beds clearly visible in the windows, poorly maintained.

 

Take a look through one of the many Facebook groups where people advertise rooms to rent, and quickly enough you’ll see posts offering a bed in a room shared with 3 other people, for at least €400 per month. The housing crisis in Dublin has driven the return of what can only be described as tenements, complete with crooked landlords, forced evictions and squalid conditions.

Some of the tenants in Summerhill Parade said they’d been evicted several times from other houses.

 

None of the tenants were ever told who the owner was. He appeared on the scene to speak to Gardaí & fire officials – a balding middle-aged man wearing only black clothing.

Who could this mystery landlord be?

Who is Michael Ryan?

Two weeks ago, Slumleaks brought you the grim story of the tenants who were forcibly evicted during the Beast from the East. But what of the man behind the headlines?

Michael Ryan is a 56-year old man based on the Clontarf road. He owns a startling 14 properties in Dublin, most of which are nowhere near Clontarf – he prefers to invest elsewhere in Dublin 6 and 8. Many of these are further subdivided into several apartments – chances are that he has had hundreds of tenants.

 

Of course this has to be too much for any one man to handle alone, so this particular slumlord’s business is a family affair. His wife Lorna and sister Eileen Kenny have been involved with a lot of these holdings, as has a network of umbrella companies and letting agencies. He’s the sole director of the curiously named Prosperity Holdings Limited, which handled the eviction of one of his tenants. This was founded in 2017, replacing the more diverse portfolio he’d had beforehand.

 

He also runs a UK-based firm called DoorInvest and a Swedish-based one called ConryAB. The Swedish one is a touch more glamourous than his Dublin slumlord activities – he even has a stake in a hotel in Berlin.

 

According to their annual report, his wife is in charge of that one. This was presumably to help him juggle the property holdings with his real passion: bringing top-class chocolate to the people of Dublin.

 

We kid you not: Michael and his brother Martin were involved with ventures such as O’Connell Street’s CocoBó café (sadly RIP) for several years.

Awkward Irish language skills aside (that translates as “Cocoa Cow” rather than anything more appetising), his passion for the stuff appears fairly genuine. He wanted to set up a chocolate museum at one stage, and was the director of a company with this aim for several years (Rycon Merrion Square Museum Limited). This was alongside his investments in adult education through Glenside Academy Ltd, which folded in 2010.

 

In 2018 he illegally evicted tenants during a snow storm. But in 2003 he was heavily involved with a company which developed orphanages abroad. He was a founding director of the International Orphanage Development Programme Company, an organization (not a registered charity) involved in sending aid and trips to Chernobyl. He was a co-director of the company along with a group of other businesspeople, including Tom McEnaney, Business Editor of the Irish Independent, until 2008.

 

While the precise details of the activities of this philanthropic program are murky, it seems a far cry from Ryan’s callous actions in recent months. This apparent philanthropy stands in stark contrast with his actions on the 2nd of March 2018, when he attempted to illegally evict three tenants into the snow, and with the reports that he evicted a pregnant woman from her home the previous month.

 

His initial reaction to the crash was to offer the use of one of his properties in Bagenalstown for free to anyone who had an idea for a business. A decent gesture, even if nobody took him up on it.

 

Sadly, recent events would indicate his heart has hardened in recent years. A man with 16 properties in Dublin alone, alongside business interests in Sweden, the UK and Berlin must be far from broke. However, his business interests away from property appear to have withered on the vine as the housing crisis took hold, with no distractions. Where once he pursued his passion for chocolate, and organised aid to orphans in Chernobyl, he now concentrates on making money from his unfortunate tenants despite being rich beyond most of our wildest dreams.

 

In addition, his sister Eileen Kenny manages a small AirBnB empire out of two of Ryan’s Dublin 8 properties. In May 2018, data site InsideAirBnb listed her as one of the top hosts in Dublin, with 16 properties available for short-term letting on the popular “home-sharing” site.

It seems that each of these properties are divided into 8 small units, rented out to tourists for short periods and a tidy profit – even more than could be made on renting them out to long-term tenants.

 

The housing crisis has brought out the worst in so many landlords, be it the paranoia of Paul Howard , the hypocrisy of Peter Begley or the mendacity of Frankie Sheehy. Now we can add the callous indifference of Michael Ryan to this list.

Michael Ryan and the Beast from the East: Tenant Stories

Friday March 2nd 2018. A Red Weather Warning of blizzard conditions grips the country. Dublin is under 3 feet of snow, shops are closed and public transport hasn’t run for the last 2 days. The government has advised people not to leave their homes, but landlord Michael Ryan (with an address on Clontarf Road) is attempting to illegally and forcibly evict three tenants from a property on Grove Park in Rathmines onto the street.

 

 

Invalid notice periods

One tenant had been living there for over 9 years, but had received just 28 days notice that his tenancy was to be ended. This was completely invalid –  if a tenant has lived in a property for 9 years, the landlord must give at least 224 days notice before ending the lease. But although the tenant had pointed this out to him, Michael Ryan went ahead with trying to evict him during the worst weather that had been seen in over 30 years.

 

The landlord came backed up by his property manager, one Chris Cozma, and another man. As one tenant put it:

I suspect that the third guy was there to intimidate – You should have seen this guy, he was about 6’ something, he was a wide guy. What he was doing there, the landlord will say “Aw, he’s a helper”. But you just imagine if you’re a tenant and you see that guy entering your house…

 

One tenant, who lived alone in an apartment, had left to go to the shop. The landlord and his helpers entered the apartment, left the windows open and drilled the door shut behind them before leaving. They left all of the tenants personal possessions inside the barred-up apartment, at the mercy of the elements.

 

Michael Ryan then attempted to evict two young women from another apartment in the same building out into the snow.  The tenants reported that they had asked for a proper contract, and for some minor repairs to be done, and within 5 days they were given a 14-day notice to leave the apartment. Both tenants had been living in the apartment for over 6 months, so were entitled to a minimum of 35 days notice before there contract was terminated, as well as being given a valid reason why they had to leave. A 14-day notice is completely illegal.

Shortly after receiving their invalid termination notice, the tenants contacted Threshold and filed an RTB case to dispute it. They had informed Mr Ryan by email that there was an RTB dispute in process challenging the invalid termination notice. Legally, while an RTB case is ongoing, a landlord can’t evict the tenants. This didn’t bother Michael Ryan though. When they reminded him of all this, he replied “I want my property back.”

 

Community mobilizes to stop the eviction

Michael Ryan and his heavies attempted to forcibly gain entrance to the women’s home, against their will. He demanded to know why they were still there; they replied that they had filed a dispute with the RTB and were waiting to hear the results of it. They tried to close the door, but he pushed them and blocked the door, telling them “Get your fucking stuff and get out of here.”

Once the tenants had managed to lock the door they called Threshold. However, as most of the country was shut down due to the red alert storm warning, there was only skeleton staff on at Threshold. The tenants were advised to call the Gardaí, which they did immediately, however there was no sign of the Gardaí at the scene.

 

The tenants then called a neighbour who lived in a next-door building, who immediately got involved. He was shocked that Mr Ryan was trying to put people out in the streets in the snow, so he confronted him. At this point, the tenant mentioned earlier, who had been out at the shops, returned, and joined in the argument. The landlord was forced to back down and reopen the door of the first tenant’s apartment. However, he threatened to come back later in the evening to finish the job.

 

At this point the neighbour contacted a local housing group, Dublin Renter’s Union, who got involved at once. A tenant describes just how important it was to have their support:

Without [Dublin Renters Union] help, its very likely that the landlord and his people…  were going to be there that very night again to try to force their way in. Because [DRU activist] Peter rang him and informed him that he was breaking the law in a very serious manner, he kind of back-tracked.

 

Garda lack of knowledge

However when Dublin Renter’s Union activists went to the local Garda station in Rathmines to report an attempted illegal eviction, they didn’t get much support. Even though the landlord was clearly breaking the law, the Gardaí didn’t appear to realise this, and appeared to think a landlord could do as he liked with his own property.

 

In fact, it is a landlord’s responsibility to leave their tenants in ‘peaceful and exclusive occupation’ of their homes.

 

Failures of landlord obligations

Although this was the first time Mr Ryan had attempted to evict them, the tenants had a long history of difficulties with him. In one apartment there was a problem with the switch for the shower, causing the shower to switch off automatically after a few minutes. Although this was a minor problem, it took several months for Mr Ryan to fix it.

 

The same apartment had no hot water in the kitchen for several months. For three months, the tenants had been asking the property manager to fix the problem since August, but when he finally brought a replacement boiler to the apartment he left it there for three weeks on the floor of the living space, ignoring the tenants requests for it to be installed. In total, they were left without hot water in the kitchen for four months.

 

Like many other slum landlords investigated by Slumleaks, Mr Ryan and his property manager don’t seem to understand that the law requires them to arrange a visit 24 hours before entering the apartment, and that it must be accepted by the tenant. Or maybe it’s just that they don’t care.

 

One tenant describes how workmen would arrive without any warning: “There have been multiple instances of him and his handymen basically forcing his way into my house. This has happened many times. They show up without any notice whatsoever, and then they just walk in. They knock first but as far as I know, they have keys of their own. The knocking is just a formality.”

 

Pregnant woman evicted

Tenants also describe other tenants who have been evicted by Mr Ryan, including, shockingly, a pregnant woman who was evicted just weeks before the attempted eviction on March 2nd.

From what I understand she was told that the place had been rented for one person only and if she was expecting she couldn’t stay there. She was pregnant. And she was told that the terms of the lease only covers one person, not two people, for the flat.

 

The Beast from the East

One tenant reflects on the extreme weather Mr Ryan tried to force them out into, and what might have happened, with all transport stopped and nowhere to go.

Just taking into consideration the way the weather was pounding us, I’d say it’s very likely that we would not be alive. That weather is not kind.”

 

But the landlord didn’t seem worried about the consequences of his actions.

His demeanor was like a victorious boxer – ‘I triumphed, you are out of here.’ His demeanor was basically ‘I don’t care, you’re gone.’

 

Who is Francis Coleman “Frank” Sheehy?

Ever heard of Coleman Francis “Frank” Sheehy?

You should have. Not only is he the landlord of 28 Gardiner Place who intimidated four tenants out of their home in December 2017, he’s also someone with an interesting past and present that we think you might have missed.

 

 

For a few weeks in 2013-14, he was famous for all the wrong reasons as the “Hot Water Guy” – he had just been appointed to the board of directors of Irish Water, and nobody could figure out why.

He was nicknamed the  “Hot Water Guy” for two reasons. The first was his sharp dress sense, athletic physique and glamourous girlfriend. The second was that the newspapers knew next to nothing else about him, as Irish Water declined to divulge anything about his professional life other than that he was a property developer who was “currently involved in property investment and real estate in Ireland, the UK and in Central and Eastern Europe.”

You can read the full biography here. It’s a masterpiece of brevity. In fact, it’s so short that it doesn’t mention if Frank had any relevant qualifications or experience in civil engineering, town planning, the utilities industry or government at any level. Probably because he doesn’t.

 

Further press requests for information about who he was, or what was his connection with Irish Water, were met with silence. All the press had to go on were some photographs from social media and the news that himself and his brother Andrew Sheehy had a business called Melot Properties.

 

However, one reporter did uncover a curious link between Frank and Fine Gael. His brother and business partner Andrew Sheehy had donated €1,000 to Lucinda Creighton’s 2007 election campaign, and photos soon emerged of Andrew with then-Taoiseach Enda Kenny and other prominent Fine Gael donors and fundraisers.

 

Why was Frank on the board of Irish Water, and not Andrew?

Lucinda Creighton may have denied knowing Andrew, but Enda Kenny had no such excuses. Andrew had already been in trouble over an audit in 2006. Revenue found he had neglected to declare his capital gains tax liabilities and accordingly fined him €163,443. He repeated the trick the following year by failing to declare over €110,000 in rental income. He was fined an additional €52,924 for this.

Presumably the more reserved Frank was supposed to be a safer bet for public service, but sadly not. After standing down from the Irish Water board a year later in November 2014, both himself and Andrew were in trouble with the taxman for failing to lodge corporate tax returns for Melot Properties in 2015. Since then, Frank has been quiet.

It’s understandable when you look at the fortunes of Melot Properties Ltd over the last few years. They’ve been in receivership for several years, which is enough to keep anyone busy.

We know Frank Sheehy isn’t one for the limelight. However, seeing as his tenants have complained about rent being exclusively handled in cash, and how he’s avoided keeping rent books or handing out contracts in the past, Slumleaks would like to pose a question. Given Frank and Andrew have been in trouble for not declaring rental income in the past, is this the reason they’ve kept such a low profile since their fifteen minutes of fame in 2014?

 

Coleman Francis “Frank” Sheehy: Tenant Stories

Paul Howard, whose network of shoddy and overpriced accommodation around Dublin and even further afield has been documented in detail on this site before, is far from the only slum landlord in the area around Mountjoy Square. In the weeks coming up to Christmas, another group of tenants found themselves forced out of their homes. Once again it was by a landlord with little regard for the law.

 

Whilst he is known only to the tenants as Frank, this landlord’s full name is Coleman Francis Sheehy.

He collected the rent in cash every month just like Paul Howard, and the tenants were never provided with a rent-book.

Tenant G told us;

He would text me saying “tomorrow I will collect the rent at eight”. Just two days before the rent he’d send me a text saying the hour and the time.

 

The apartment on Gardiner Place had building materials left lying around on the stairways. As well as this, a fire exit on the first floor had been fastened shut.

Tenant L: The building was very old. The rooms were very small. The bathroom was in very bad condition. Very bad. The floor was completely damaged. On the floor there were holes, so he put fake carpet to cover this so we could use it… he said he would fix it, but for that we needed to leave the apartment for two days, and he never showed up. In the last week we were there the kitchen started to leak water through the wall.

 

Know your rights

The tenants in this case were all young migrants. They had been living in the apartment for several months when they received an angry message on the 27th of November 2017 from Frank, claiming he did not know them, and demanding that they vacate the apartment immediately.

Tenant L told us;

Frank phoned and said that we are illegal here, that he doesn’t know us. That he will call the police if we don’t leave the apartment now. He was really threatening us.

 

This was illegal, although the tenants did not know this.

By law, a landlord must provide a minimum of 28 days notice before he can evict a tenant. This notice must be on paper – emails, texts or Whatsapps are not valid eviction notices.Instead of a legal eviction notice, Frank had sent a series of aggressive Whatsapp messages demanding that the tenants – who had been paying their rent on time every month – leave immediately.

 

From the beginning of these angry messages, Frank maintained that the tenants were there illegally & that he had never met any of them before.However he had communicated with Tenant G via Whatsapp several times, and met her at the flat at least once while collecting rent.

Tenant L: G told him that he was lying, that he did know her. That they had met before when she gave him rent in October… Every time that G said that he knew her, he changed the subject and said that we could be terrorists.

 

Refuses to compromise

Tenant L: We texted him saying, okay we know that we are not in your contract but we can sign a lease if you want to. We want to stay here, all of us. He continued to say “no, you are in my apartment illegally.”

 

He refused the tenants’ offer to sign a lease, and demanded that they leave within two days, or he would call the police.

Again, this was an unfounded threat, as the tenants had every right to be in the apartment. As well as this, tenancy law in Ireland is civil law, and is not dealt with by the police.

 

Scam

Understandably, the tenants were stressed and frightened.

Under the stress of this looming eviction and desperate to find another place to live, they fell prey to an AirBnB scam, losing several thousand euro – all as a direct result of Frank’s bullying and threats.

 

Tenant G:

between the 27th November and 7th December I’m looking for another apartment and I saw one and sent an email and it was a scam. It was on AirBnb, well fake AirBnb but I didn’t realise. I’ve used AirBnB and I know it’s ok. I was under pressure… I know it’s so silly because I never do something like that. I read about things like that. I received the email with bank details and I pay the deposit… I really don’t know why. It was so stressful. We reported it to the Gardai, they told us there was nothing they could do.

 

Backtracking

On 1st Dec, two of the tenants had arranged to meet Frank. He did not show up, but sent them a message offering a new 6 month contract. Bizarrely, he wanted the first and the last month to be paid in advance – effectively a double deposit.

This would have come to €3000 in total.

The tenants had already lost a lot of money as a result of the scam, so they didn’t have enough money to pay this double deposit that Frank was demanding. When they told him this, he demanded they leave within a week – on the 10th of December.

 

Power play

On the 10th of December, Frank had arranged to meet the tenants at noon to give back their deposit, and to get the keys back. He didn’t show up, but asked the tenants to send photos of the apartment lying empty, as proof that they had left.

 

He kept the tenants waiting on him for two hours, and sent several messages saying he would pay back just half of the deposit, claiming that he hadn’t known that the two of the tenants were living there.

 

The tenants demanded their full deposit back. Frank questioned them about the RTB case they had filed against him, and threatened to file a criminal complaint against them for extortion –  a ridiculous threat, given that all disputes between tenants and landlords must go through the RTB.

 

 

 

Finally, he asked all 4 tenants to send him a message confirming that they agreed to €1,500 of the deposit being returned –  half of what was owed.

This was to be paid to Tenant G & Tenant T, while the other two would get nothing.

 

 

The tenants who were not having their deposit returned did not message Frank agreeing to this. It’s not hard to see why.

Two months later, none of the tenants have received a cent from Frank.